摩爾倫理學的科學之路及啟示.pdf

1、湖北大學碩士學位論文摩爾倫理學的科學之路及啟示姓名：羅俐琳申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：倫理學指導教師：高樂田20090501AbstractScienceiswesterners’pride，solvingthemoralquestionbyscientificmethodisthemethodologycharacteristicofmodemwesternethicsThenegativeeffectoftechnologymakest

2、hetraditionalvirtuesfacedwithseriouschallenge，historyrequestsforimprovingtheethicsresearchGEMooreliftedthestrictscienceflag，introduceanalyticsintoethics，trieshardtomakeethicsscientificandlogicalMooreregarded“whatisgood”a

3、sethicssource，bythemethodofuniquelanguageanalytics，anddeepintothecoreofethics，heprovedandelaborated“goodisindefintble”，thenexploredtheprimaryintentionofethics_一“goodofends”and“goodofinstruments”，proposedthatintuitionismi

4、sthemethodofgraspingethics，thuscompletedtheconstructionofhisscientificethicsTostartwithanalyzingthebasicethicsconceptsandtheterminologies，Mooreemphasizedtheuniqueunanalyzabilityandindefinabilityofthemoralconceptandtheval

5、uetermthatacquiredfromintuition，regardedintuitionasamoralcognitionmethodwhichishigherthantheempiricismmethodandtherationalismmethodofallformsThisfundamentallyaffectedandchangedthedevelopmentdirectionofwesternethics，ledth

6、epastethicswhichislackofaccuracyprecision，scientificityandobjectivityintoanewstylescientificandlogicaldevelopmentapproachWhenanalyzingtheethicsjudgmentbyscientificmethod，Mooreexaggeratedthefunctionoflogicanalysis，replace

7、dthecontentanalysisoftheethicalvaluewiththelogicalanalysis，replacedtheobjectivityofethicswiththeneutralityandthenormativitywithscientificity，whichisamisinterpretationtothescienceofethicsOntheonehand，heliftedthe‘‘strictsc

8、ience’’flag，maintainedthe‘‘scientific’’form，utilizedtheanalyticalmethod，thedemonstativemethodandthetheoreticalstructureofscience，ontheotherhand，hethoughtthatscience(experiencescience)couldn’tprove“moraltroth”，people’Smor

9、alconceptreliedonpeople’SintuitionratherthanscienceHisethicsembarkedfromscientisimbuthadactuallydrawnaconclusionthatethicsiSnonscientificInfact，ethicsisnotscience，andsciencecan’tsolvemoralproblemTheparascientificityofeth