版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、上海師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文10-16歲兒童誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀現(xiàn)狀的心理學(xué)研究姓名:李勝男申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):發(fā)展與教育心理學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:岑國(guó)楨2003050110 16 歲兒童誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀現(xiàn)狀的心理學(xué)研究 3A Research on the “Cheng Xin” Value of Children at the age from 10-16 Year-old Abstract This research was based on t
2、he theory of the formation process of value, which was put forward by Value Clarification. In the research a questionnaire was used with 403 primary and middle school students aged from 10
3、to 16 year- old as subjects and four moral situational stories were compiled as stimulus materials to study “Cheng Xin”. A real situation about “Cheng” was also designed as well. The results were as f
4、ollows: (1) The 10,12,14- year- old children had the value indicators of cognitive-judgment, acting- incline, affective- experience and behavior- repeating- trend. The 16- year- old children had the value indicators of
5、cognitive- judgment, acting- incline and behavior- repeating- trend, their scores on the aspects of cognitive- judgment, acting-incline and affective- experience were less than others, and their score on behaving- repea
6、ting- trend was higher than others. (2) Comparing the two different project situations, the scores of all subjects at different ages were higher in the “role- taking project” one than in the “general project” one. (
7、3) Comparing the two incentive situations, the acting- incline was worse in the “having incentive” situation than in the “having no incentive ” one, the affective - experience of children at age of 10-year- old had no d
8、ifference between the two situations, and the affective- experience of children at age of 12-year- old and 14- year- old were much positive in the “having no incentive” situation than in the other, and the children at th
9、e age of 16-year- old was more positive in the “having incentive” situation than in the other. (4) Comparing the behaviors in the real situation with the cognitive- judgment and the acting- incline in the ques
10、tionnaire, there were differences between them. (5) No sex differences were found in the research except on the cognitive-judgment on “Cheng Xin”. (6) There were differences between the two stories about “Cheng”,
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 青少年法制價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究
- 青少年法制價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 當(dāng)代青少年親情價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究
- 青少年人權(quán)價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究
- 青少年學(xué)生關(guān)愛(ài)價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 青少年人權(quán)價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 當(dāng)代青少年親情價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 中學(xué)生核心價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 青少年學(xué)生公正價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 青少年學(xué)生生態(tài)價(jià)值觀的心理學(xué)研究.pdf
- 10-16歲兒童少年行為問(wèn)題的雙生子研究.pdf
- 大學(xué)生個(gè)體價(jià)值觀教育的心理學(xué)思考.pdf
- 誠(chéng)信價(jià)值觀培育研究.pdf
- 10-16歲1型糖尿病患兒心理行為特征及其影響因素的研究.pdf
- 動(dòng)感地帶(西式營(yíng))10-16歲-中和教育
- 10大兒童學(xué)心理學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)
- 心理學(xué)視角下的大學(xué)生價(jià)值觀形成歸因分析及對(duì)策
- 誠(chéng)信對(duì)多元價(jià)值觀的拷問(wèn)
- 行為主義心理學(xué)的兒童觀述評(píng)
- “誠(chéng)信”的價(jià)值觀意蘊(yùn)與建構(gòu)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論