腎部分切除術(shù)和根治性腎切除術(shù)對(duì)早期腎細(xì)胞癌的遠(yuǎn)期療效對(duì)比.pdf

1、新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文腎部分切除術(shù)和根治性腎切除術(shù)對(duì)早期腎細(xì)胞癌的遠(yuǎn)期療效對(duì)比姓名：斯坎達(dá)爾申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：外科學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：王玉杰2009-04新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 —2—Long-term Follow-up of the Comparison of Nephron Sparing Surgery vs Radical Nephrectomy in Patients with Unilateral Early Ren

2、al Cell Carcinoma Postgraduate: Sikandaer Supervisor: Prof. Wang Yujie Abstract Objectives: To perform a long-term follow-up of a matched comparison of radical nephrectomy andNSS in patients with single unilateral ren

3、al cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. To further investigate the clinical effects and safety ofelective nephron sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the cl

4、inical documents of 32 cases of RCCC who underwent nephron sparing surgery. Of the 32 patients from March 2004 to February 2008，22 were male and 19 were female，with an average age of 51.7 years．The mean diameter of the t

5、umors was 3.65 cm.The evaluated factors included postoperative complications and incidence of postoperative local recurrence．At the same time we choose 40 RCCC cases belong to the clinical stage T1a with radical nephrect

6、omy as the retrospective control.Results：The operation was performed successfully in all the 72 patients.There was no significant difference between the two groups with age,tumor diameter,pathological classification, ope

7、rative time,blood loss during operation.At the end of the follow up，no patients treated with NSS had died,none of them tumour related. Conclusions: NSS is as effective as RN for the treatment of localized RCC on long-ter

8、m follow-up and NSS can safe and effective to retain the functional renal units with less local recurrence rate.It is selective for RCC patients with localized unilateral tumor and a normal contralateral kidney. Key word