25261.師范院校生物學(xué)專業(yè)教育實(shí)習(xí)評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建

1、華東師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文師范院校生物學(xué)專業(yè)教育實(shí)習(xí)評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建姓名：陳亞君申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：課程與教學(xué)論生物指導(dǎo)教師：鄭曉蕙20100401ABSTRACTTeachingpractice，anessentialpartofpracticuminbiologyteachereducation，isthebeginningofprofessionaldevelopmentforstudentsinnormalschoolsandp

2、laysanimportantroleintheirprofessionalgrowthNowadaysitisallimportantopportunitytefcIlnlnormalschoolsDuringthetimebiologyteachereducationhasachancetodevelopandteachingpracticeisalsoconcernedmuchTherehasntbeenaneffectiveev

3、aluationsystemforteachingpracticumforalongtimeanditisdifficulttoadapttotherequirementsofthenewperiodThestudyattemptedtoestablishawiderangeofmultipleevaluationsystemforbiologyteachingpracticeinnormalschools，whichontheoneh

4、andwouldimprovestudentteachers’teachingclassmanagementandscientificresearchskillsandontheotherhandwouldpromotethereformationofteachingpracticeByreferringtotherelevantliteratures，wefirstlydescribedtheexistingstateofteachi

5、ngpracticeeducationhomeandabroadanddocumentedrelatedtheoryespeciallythetheoryofmultipleevaluationMeanwhile，thestatusquoofbiologyteachingpracticeandevaluationoftraineeswassummarizedthroughanationwidesurveyshowingthattheev

6、aluationsysternneededreformurgentlyThenweinterviewedtheteachersinchargeofteachingpracticeinnormalschoolstoreviewtheproblemsariseinthecurrentevaluationprocess，andunderstandthetrendofrefornlandtheirexpectationsofevaluation

7、Thestudyinvestigatedthesupervisingteachersandnormalstudents’opinioilsattitudeandsuggestionsonevaluationoftraineeteachersbymeansofquestionnaireanddataanalysisAtierrationalanalyzingtheobjectives，content，elementsandcharacte

8、risticsofbiologyteachingpracticum，wedeterminedthattheprinciplesofevaluationsystemshouldbecomprehensivescientificandeasytooperate，andtheaimshouldbepromotingtheprofessionaldevelopmentofnormalstudents，andtheevaluationproces

9、sshouldintegratequalitativeanalysiswithquantitativeanalysisanduseselfevaluation，peerevaluationandstudents’evaluationappropriatelyBasedonreconstructionandreflectionwesetupamultipleevaluationsystemnamed”EvaluationHandbookf

10、orBiologyTeachingPractice”，including”teachingskillsscale”，”classmanagementskillsscale”，’’participationscaleofteachingpractice(researchskillsscaleincluded)””selfevaluationscale”，”peerevaluationscale”，”students’evaluationo

11、fteachersscale””solopracticefeedbackscale”，whichcoveredcomprehensivelythetrainees’1ivesinpracticesch001WeuseditinEastChinaNormalUniversitywhenundergraduatesofSchoolofLifeSciencewenttopracticeandinvestigatedtheusersaftert

12、hetrialbyquestionnaireThedataanalysisindicatedthattheevaluationsystemwasrecognizableandacceptablebythesupervisingteachersandtraineeteachersAccordingtotheusers’opinionsandsomeexperts’recommendatioils，theevaluationhandbook

13、wassimplifiedandrevisedtobecomeapracticalmanual”Biology1’eachingPracticeHandbook”includingaseriesofevaluationsealesAccordingtotheproblemsexistinginteachingpracticeofnormalschoolstheresearchtriedtomakeausefulexplorationan

14、dreformedinevaluationfieldWewentdeepintospecificareaofbiologyteachereducation，andconstructedamultipleevaluationsystemofteachingpracticefornormalstudentsmajorinbiologyThepracticablesystemwasoperativeanddefinitebutstillnee