一些英文審稿意見及回復(fù)的模板

1、一些英文審稿意見的模板一些英文審稿意見的模板最近在審一篇英文稿，第一次做這個(gè)工作，還有點(diǎn)不知如何表達(dá)。幸虧遇上我的處女審稿，我想不會(huì)槍斃它的，給他一個(gè)majrevision后接收吧。呵呵網(wǎng)上找來(lái)一些零碎的資料參考參考。1、目標(biāo)和結(jié)果不清晰。ItisnotedthatyourmanuneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticu

2、larattentiontoEnglishgrammarspellingsentencestructuresothatthegoalsresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.2、未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。Ingeneralthereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.Furthermeanexplanatio

3、nofwhytheauthsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.3、對(duì)于研究設(shè)計(jì)的rationale:Alsotherearefewexplanationsoftherationalefthestudydesign.4、夸張地陳述結(jié)論夸大成果不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)：Theconclusionsareoverstated.Fexamplethestudydidnotshowifthesideeffects

4、frominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerfmulation.5、對(duì)hypothesis的清晰界定：Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。6、對(duì)某個(gè)概念或工具使用的rationale定義概念：WhatwastherationalefthefilmSBFvolumeratio7、對(duì)研究問(wèn)題的定義：Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispap

5、erinmeclearwriteonesectiontodefinetheproblem8、如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫literaturereview:Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.國(guó)人一篇文章投Mater.類知名國(guó)際雜志，被塞爾維亞一審稿人打25分！個(gè)人認(rèn)為文章還是有一些創(chuàng)新的，所以作為審稿人我就給了66分，（這個(gè)分正常應(yīng)該足以發(fā)表），提了一些修改意見，望

6、作者修改后發(fā)表！登錄到編輯部網(wǎng)頁(yè)一看，一個(gè)文章竟然有六個(gè)審稿人，詳細(xì)看了下打的分?jǐn)?shù)，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但沒(méi)有打分（另一國(guó)人審），最后一個(gè)沒(méi)有回來(lái)！兩個(gè)拒的是需要我們反思和學(xué)習(xí)的?。ɡㄌ?hào)斜體內(nèi)容為我注解）Reviewer4ReviewerRecommendationTerm:RejectOverallReviewerManuRating:25CommentstoEdit:R

7、eviewersarerequiredtoentertheirnameaffiliationemailaddressbelow.Pleasenotethisisfadministrativepurposeswillnotbeseenbytheauth.Title(Prof.Dr.Mr.Mrs.):Prof.Name:XXXAffiliation:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxManuentitled“Synthe

8、sisXXX。。。。。。。。。。?！癷thasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsinavarietyoffms.Thismanudoesnotbringanynewknowledgedataonmaterialspropertytherefeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethodstillthispointisnotelabated

9、properly(seeRemark1).Presentationwritingisratherpothereareseveralstatementsnotsupptedwithdata(fsomeseeRemarks2)evensomeflaws(seeRemark3).FthesereasonsIsuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentfm.1.Thepaperdescribesanewmethodfprep

10、arationofXXXXbut:thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsfpreparationofXXXXpowders(INTRODUCTIONliteraturedataRESULTSDISCUSSIONdiscussion)（通常的寫作格式，審稿人實(shí)際上很在意的）ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterdifferentfromothermet