簡介：上海大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)合理性的法哲學(xué)分析財產(chǎn)自由主義與工具主義的比較姓名宮建新申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)憲法學(xué)與行政法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李瑜青20030501海人學(xué)硼卜學(xué)位論義財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)臺刪性的法哲學(xué)分析ABSTRACTITISTHECOURSEOFSEEKINGTRUTHFORHUMANBEINGSINLAWTHATWESTUDYTHERATIONALISMOFPROPERTYRIGHTSPHIOSOPHICALLY，ANDALSOISMEANINGFULFOROURSOCIALGOALOFRULEOFTAWITISPOSSIBLETOUSEOURPROPERTYRIGHTSCORRECTLYONLYIFWECOULDFINDITSREALSPIRITS，ANDONLYWITHTHISWECOULDREDUCETHESOCIALCOSTSINOURLEGALPROJECTOFRULEOFLAW，IELESSENTHEDAMAGEOFHUMANITIESTHEESSAYISDIVIDEDINTOSIXSECTIONSONEPREFACEANDFIVEOTHERCHAPTERSINTHEPREFACE，THEAUTHORINTRODUCEDTHECONFLICTOFTWOPHILOSOPHIESONTHEPLATFORMOFPROPERTYRIGHTS，INOTHORWORDS，THECONFLICTOFPROPRIETARIANISMANDINSTRUMENTALISM，ANDSHOWEDHISQUESTIONINGSTOTHELATTERSECONDLY，INCHAPTER1，THEAUTHORGAVEABRIEFINTRODUCTIONOFTHREECHALLENGINGTHEORIES，THESOCIALIZATIONOFPROPMTYRIGHTS，THEECONOMICANALYSISOFLAWANDTHEDUTYBEARINGPRIVILEGESANDTHEAUTHORALSOFOUNDTHATTHETHREETHEORIESHADTHESAMEPHILOSOPHICALBASISOFINSTRUMENTALISMINCHAPTER2THEESSAYSTUDIEDTHEHISTORICANDTHERACIALCONCEPTIONSOFPROPERTYRIGHTSTHROUGHTHISWAYTHEAUTHOJHASDEFINEDTHEBORDEROFPROPERTYRIGHTSINCHAPTER3，AFTERREVIEWINGTHECLASSICALTHEORIESOFPROPERTYRIGHTS，INCLUDINGTHELABORPROPERTYOFLOCKEANDTHEFREEWILLOFHEGEL，THEWRITERHASSHOWEDUSAGENERALFEATUREOFTHEMTHECOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFCLASSICALTHEORIESOFPROPERTYRIGHTSANDINSTRUMENTALISMISTHEMAINCONTENTOFCHAPTER4THEMAINREASONTHATHASMISTAKENTHESPIRITSOFPROPERTYRIGHTSSUCCESSFULLYISTHATITISCONFUSEDBYTHERELATIONSHIPOFTHEORIESANDREALITIESFINALLY，THEARTICLEBELIEVEDTHATWESHOULDCHOOSECLASSICALTHEORIESASOURFUNDAMENTALLYPHILOSOPHICALBASEOFTHECONSTRUCTIONOFLEGALSYSTEMASFORINSTRUMENTALISMCARLBEONEOFACCESSORIESINTHECOURSEOFRULEOFLAWKEYWORDSPROPERTYRIGHTSPROPRIETARIANISMNATURALRIGHTSINSTRUMENTALISMLOCKEHEGEL

簡介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中國社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期公共權(quán)力異化的哲學(xué)思考姓名冷梅申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李光玉2003510華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONISDIFFERENTFROMTHEORIGINALPOWERWHICHPOWERITSELFPRODUCESTHEOPPOSEMIGHTANDLOSETHE15RIMARYQUALIMTIVEREGULATIONONEOFTHEEXTREMEREPRESENTATIONSOFPOWERALIENATIONISCORRUPTIONJIANGZEMINPOINTSOUTINTHEREPORTMADEINTHE16THNATIONALCONGRESSOFTHECOMMUNISTPARTYOFCHINA‘PREVENTINGANDCOMBATINGCORRUPTIONISAIMPORTANTPOLITICALTASK?！甌HEPARTYMUSTNOTONLYREALIZETHEPRESSUREOFANTICORRUPTION，BUTALSEALIZETHATITWILLCONTINUEALONGPERIODTIMETHEPARTYMUSTNEVERWAVERINCARRYINGONTHEFIGHTAGAINSTCORRUPTIONBYMAKINGSTEADFASTCONFIDENCEANDMAKINGSOLIDWORK’’CONSIDERINGTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONWENOTONLYTHINKPOWERALIENATIONITSELFBUTALSOANALYZETHECAUSESOFPOWERALIENATIONANDDISCUSSTHEMEASURESTHEPURPOSEISTOMAKETHEPARTYSTATUSSTABLEANDMAKETHEPOWERENDOWEDWITHBYPEOPLESERVETHEPEOPLEINDEEDTHUSTHEFUNDAMENTAIINTERESTSOFTHEPEOPLECANBEREALIZEDATTHESAMETIME，THEREFLECTIONISTOIMPROVETHECADRE’DIATHESISWHICHISREQUIREDTOBEENHANCEDATTHEPRESENTTIMETHEARTICLEAIMSTOCONSIDERTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONINTRANSITIONALPERIODBASEDONMARXISMTHEORYSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYTHEORYANDPOLITICALTHEORYETETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHEQUESTIONINVOLVINGTHREEASPECTSFIRSTLYHOWTOLOOKATTHEPHENOMENONTHEAUTHORTHINKSPOWERALIENATIONISASICKPHENOMENONASHUMANCOMEINTOPOLITICALSOCIETYTHEOWNERSOFPOWERAPPLYPOWERTOENLISTPRIVATEINTERESTSTHUS，THEPOWERDEVIATESTHECOMMONOBJECTIVEANDVIOLATESTHEPEOPLE’SINTERESTS，JUSTICEANDVALIDITYTHEAUTHORANALYZESTHEQUESTIONFROMSUCHWAYSASPROCESSANDINTERIORSTRUCTURESECONDLYWHYDOESPOWERALIENATETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHECAUSESLEADINGTOPOWERALIENATIONINTHEPOLITICALANDECONOMICPERSPECTIVEMOREOVER，WEEXAMINETHESEEDBEDOFPOWERALIENATIONFROMTHECULTUREASPECTFINALLYHOWCALLWEPREVENTANDCONTROLPOWERALIENATIONTHEARTICLEHASPUTFORWARDASERIESOFSUGGESTIONFROMTHEINSTITUTIONALINNOVATION，F(xiàn)OSTERINGCIVILSOCIETYANDFORMULATINGTHECIVICCULTUREKEYWORDSSOCIALTRANSITIONPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONII

簡介：南京師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文合法化、合理性與正義程序訴訟程序的哲學(xué)之維姓名韓德明申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李力200351合法化、合理性與J下義程序第3頁共57負摘要，F(xiàn)F基于分離的事實與規(guī)范的整合需求，訴訟程序獲得了合法性前提，并因內(nèi)在于程序規(guī)則的事件的挑戰(zhàn)和外在于程序規(guī)則的事件的介入而合法化。得以合法化的訴訟程序勢必有其合理性實踐訴求，對此，本文結(jié)合訴訟程序兩種實踐模式一一職權(quán)主義和當(dāng)事人主義一一所表征的兩種合理性內(nèi)涵，指明職權(quán)主義程序模式的工具目的合理性性質(zhì)和當(dāng)事人主義程序模式的規(guī)范價值合理性性質(zhì)／并認為它們都是單向度體現(xiàn)了訴訟程序的合理性精神。進而，Y本文引入交往合理性理論，以其作為理論工具分析了訴訟程序的合理性問題，指出訴訟程序涉及犯罪糾紛事實、法律規(guī)范和主體意志三種本體論范疇，從而真正體現(xiàn)合理性的訴訟程序應(yīng)當(dāng)是追求真實、體現(xiàn)正當(dāng)、主體真誠的三位一體。對此，本文還借用語用學(xué)工具，進一步分析和論證了訴訟程序以上三個方面的合理性要求。由于職權(quán)主義或當(dāng)事人主義訴訟程序模式具有刻意設(shè)計的原因，從而作為唯理性設(shè)計的方案在實踐落實上必然難逃自我解構(gòu)的命運。對兩種唯理性設(shè)計的程序模式進行解構(gòu)主義閱讀的結(jié)局，是程序的多元主義或語境主義。當(dāng)然，程序多元主義或語境主義并非對表征交往合理性的訴訟程序理念的顛覆，恰恰相反，程序多元主義正是對程序交往合理性要求的捍衛(wèi)和保證。關(guān)鍵詞訴訟雜殍合法性交往各運，洼語用事正義茬序，程序解構(gòu)

簡介：置南大學(xué)周滅匕學(xué)位論文題名中英對照文化哲學(xué)視野中的國際關(guān)系理論作者姓名郭彥指導(dǎo)教師姓名及學(xué)位、職稱陳喬之教授博士生導(dǎo)師學(xué)科、專業(yè)名稱國際關(guān)系論文提交日期年月日論文答辯日期答辯委員會主席論文評閱人學(xué)位授予單位和日期，一一，，，，，，，加兀妙口滋‘縱“，口，〔流月沁護

簡介：延邊大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文實現(xiàn)中國法治的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)姓名王麗申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)憲法學(xué)與行政法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師何云鵬20070515ABSTRACTATPRESENT，CHINA’SMODERNIZATIONPROCESSOFTHEFULEOFLAWINTOANUNPRECEDENTEDPERJODOFPROSPERITYANDGLORY；HOWEVER，GUIDINGPHILOSOPHYOFTHEMODEMLAWISNOTACONSTRUCTATPRESENT，MANYLEGALPRACTITIONERSHAVEBEENDISCUSSINGTHISISSUEBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFTRADITIONAICHINESEANDWESTEMPHILOSOPHY王1RANCE，THEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESCOMPAREDTOTHEGAPBETWEENTHETWOSIDESLIE，CONSTRUCTIONOFCHINAINANATTEMPTTOFINDAMODEMPHILOSOPHYOFLAW，TOPMMOTETHERULE0FLAWINTHEPROCESSOFCHINA’S，HELPINSOMEWAYCHINALAWCOURSEOFHISTORICALDEVELOPMENT，ANDALTHOUGHITISNOT1IKETHEWEST，THEREWERECLEARWHICHLAWSCHOOL；HOWEVER，CHINALAWHISTORICALDEVELOPMENTCLEARLYHASAMAINLINE；FRANCEINPARTICULARISTHEPHILOSOPHYOFCIVILJZATIONISVERYCLEALCHINAANDFRANCEISLHATTBEPHILOSOPHYOFCJVINZATJONJSBASICALLYCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYTOTHEMAINSTREAM，WITHLAWLESSONSATTHEPHILOSOPHY_OFSUPPORT，TOTAOISTPHILOSOPHYTOADDTHATSUCHANINHERITEDFTOMTHECONTEXTWESTEMPHILOSOPHYCIVILIZATIONTOAMORE0BVIOUSMODEMWESTEMSCHOOLFOURDAFAISTHEENTIREWESTEMSOCIETYPHILOSOPHYOFTHELAWWEREINTEGRATEDTHEFEFORE，THISPAPEFANALYZESTHECHINESEANDWESTERNREPRESENTATIONOFTHESEJURISTSTHEPHILOSOPHYCONNOTATION，ANDTOCONLPARETHEIRRESPECTIVEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESISTHEHOPEOFMODERNCHINESEPHILOSOPHYEXPLORETHEDEVEL叩MENTOFTHEBRIGHTLIGHTSUPATRACEANCIENTCHINESELAWISTHEFIRSTMETHODFROMTHEBE西NNINGOFTLLEPHILOSOPHICALMETHOD；WESTERNJURJSTSANCIENTMETHODWASFIRSTINPOLITICALSCIENCE卸DPHILOSOPHYMETHODBEGANVISIBILITYANDWESTERNPHILOSOPHYRESEARCHPERSPECTIVEFORTHEDEVELOPMENTOFJURISPMDENCEWASTOESTABLISHTHEBASICFRAMEWORKANDSTARTEDTHEFIRSTLAWPRACTICEAILCIENTPHILOSOPHYANDMETHODSHAVEBEENEXAMINEDBYTHEINTERESTANDFOCUS，THEAUTHORALSOPHILOSOPHICALMETHODTOINJECTSUCHAGREATENTHUSIASMANDINDEPTHTHINKINGCATEREDTOTHEMODERNSTUDYOFTHESCIENCEOFPARADIGMSHIFTTHETRENDTHATISTOEXAMINETHECONTENTBASEDMETHODOLOGY；THEVALUE0FASINGLETFENDFROMTHECLASSWILLSHIFTVALUEPLURALISM；PHILOSOPHYRESEARCHMETHODSFROMTHEOVERALLTENDENCYOFTHEMODE加DOCTRINEOFINDIVJDUALISMLAWT00LS，INTHISTIMEOFTHETRENDOFTHETIMESINTHECONTEMPORARYMARXJSTPHILOSOPHYBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFSEVERALWELLKNOWNCHINESEANDWESTERNSCHOOLOFLAWPHILOSOPHY，CHINESEANDWESTERNLEGALMETHODSII

簡介：湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文吳經(jīng)熊對霍姆斯法律哲學(xué)之承繼與超越姓名李冬松申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師黎曉平20070605IIABSTRACTSINCETHEINITIATIONOFLEGALREFMATIONINLATEQINGDYNASTYCHINESELAWYERSHAVEDEVOTEDTHEMSELVESTOTHEQUESTOFLEGALSIGNIFICANCEINTHEPEOPLE’SLIVINGAMONGTHEMJOHNCHWUISTHEMOSTEMINENTFHISGIFTEDCOGNITIONOFLAWPROFOUNDUNDERSTINGOFTHETRENDSOFLAWDEVELOPMENTTHESPIRITOFLAWHISFIRMBELIEFINPOSITIVISMMETAPHYSICSTHROUGHOUTHISACADEMICQUESTHEHASENDEAVEDTOTRANSCENDIENTALOCCIDENTALTHEIESOFLAWWU’STHEYOFLAWISABUNDANTINITSCONTENTHISPHILOSOPHYOFLAWINPARTICULARHISTHREEDIMENSIONTHEYOFLAWISWIDELYTAKENASTHEIGINATIONOFCHINESENEOANALYTICALSCHOOLOFJURISPRUDENCEPROVIDINGENRICHINGTHELEGALARGUMENTATIONOFHOLMES’PREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWHEATTACHESMUCHIMPTANCETOTHERESEARCHONTHESCIENTIFICMETHODSINJUDICIALPROCESSTHEPSYCHOLOGICALFACTSINLAWINTRODUCESPSYCHOLOGYINTOLEGALRESEARCHHETAKESLAWASANARTOFBALANCINGINTERESTSDEMONSTRATESHISSPLENDIDINTUITIONINTHEUSEOFTHISARTFOLLOWINGSTTHOMASAQUINASWUBASESNATURALLAWONTHEREALWLDMAKESITALIVERULETHATCHANGESTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIETYTHISTHESISPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWFTHEQUESTOFTHESPECIALVALUEOFWU’STHEYOFLAWWU’SNEOANALYTICALLEGALTHEYTHOUGHIGINATINGINHOLMES’THEYDEVELOPSANEWSCHOOLOFTHEYONTHEBASISOFACOMPOUNDOFTHOUGHTSOFMANYOTHERLEGALSCHOOLSPROMOTESTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEREALISMJURISPRUDENCETOANEWSTAGEHISINTELLECTUALCONTEMPLATIVEINTUITIONINSPIREDBYHOLMES’PERCEPTIONOFLAWINTEGRATESTHECHINESEINTUITIONHOLMES’INTOANEWSTYLEOFPERCEPTIONOFLAWHISTHEYOFNATURALLAWINTEGRATESSCIENCERELIGIOUSWSHIPETERNALITYTRANSIENCECHANGEABILITYPERSISTENCEWHICHPROVIDESINSPIRATIONSFTHECURRENTPREDOMINANCEOFPOSITIVISMRELATIVISMINLEGALRESEARCHTHISTHESISISCOMPOSEDOFFIVEPARTSTHEINTRODUCTIONPARTINTRODUCESTHEBACKGROUNDOFTHISRESEARCHCURRENTDEVELOPMENTOFTHEAREAPERSPECTIVESTHESTRUCTUREOFTHETHESISCHAPTERONEANALYZESHOLMES’PHILOSOPHYOFLAWFROMWU’SPERSPECTIVECHAPTERTWOINTRODUCESWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWFOCUSINGONHISNEOANALYTICALTHEYOFLAWTHEYOFNATURALLAWEPISTEMOLOGYOFLAWCHAPTERTHREEPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWTOPROBEINTOTHELINKSBETWEENTHETWOTHESPECIALFEATURESOFWU’STHEYOFLAWTHECONCLUSIONPARTPRESENTSCOMMENTSONWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWKEYWDSJOHNCHWUHOLMESNEOANALYTICALJURISPRUDENCEPREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWEVOLVINGNATURALLAW

簡介：浙江大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文董仲舒政治哲學(xué)發(fā)微姓名崔濤申請學(xué)位級別博士專業(yè)中國古典文獻學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師崔富章20040401ABSTRACTCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYISTHEMOSTIMPORTANT“IDEAISTICGENE”O(jiān)FCHINESECULTUREWHICHCANNEVERBEIGNORED，ANDTODAYWECANNEVERTALKABOUTCHINESEPHILOSOPHYTHOUGHTWITHOUTTHISSCH001WHILEINTERMSOFCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYITSELFDONGZHONGSHU，ACONFUCIANSCHOLARWHOLIVEDINWESTHAN，HADPLAYEDAGREATROLEINTHEHISTORICALPROCESSOFCONFUCIANTHOUGHT’SDEVELOPMENT，EVOLVEMENTANDFORMINGITSOWNSTYLEITISPROVIDEDTHATWECALLNOTDISCOURSEDONCHINESEPHILOSOPHYWITHOUTCONFUCIANISM，THENWECANALSONOTDISCOURSEONCONFUCIANISMWITHOUTDONGZHONGSHUEITHERHISSTORYORHISLEARNINGISACONTROVERSIALBUTATTRACTIVE“PROBLEM“THISDISSERTATIONMAKESOMETRIALINDIVIDUALREADINGONDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHICALTHOUGHTTHISDISSERTATIONINCLUDESASFOLLOWSAFEWCHAPTERSPRIMARILYINTRODUCTIONFROMHORIZONOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYBYPHENOMENOLOGICALHERMENEUTICREADINGMETHOD，IANALYZETHEHISTORICALORIGINOFTHETHEORYOFTHEDONGZHONGSHUANDTHEPRESENTSTUDYCONDITIONSBRIEFLYANDEXPATIATETHEPOSSIBILITYOFHISTHEORYTOBEREGARDEDASAKINDOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYANDTHEATTITUDEWESHOULDHOLDTOWARDSREADINGHISTEXTCHAPTERIIDISCUSSTHERECONDITECHARACTEROFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYIANALYZEDONG’SHORIZONOFUNSCRAMBLINGCLASSICINAWAYOF‘‘HISTORICALCREATINGCOMPREHENSION’’ANDHISREADINGTOTHEWRITINGOFCHUNGMWHICHHEREGARDED∞APOLITICALAFFAIRCHAPTERIFIDISCUSSDOOG’SHISTORICAL‘SAY”ABOUTTHEIDEAOFSECULARVALUEIDISCUSSDONG’SESTABLISHMENTOFTHECONCEPTIONOFCONFUCIAN“VIITUOUSPOLITICS”德政ANDHISREASONINGONBENEVOLENCE仁WHICHHEREGARDEDASANATION’SJUSTICEFROMHISLOGISTICDIALECTICOFCONFUCIANTHEORYOFHUMANISMCHAPTERIIIINTHISCHAPTERIDISCUSSTHEPROBLEMOFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY’SAPPEALINGTOTHEMETAPHYSICSOFTHEFOUNDATIONOFSECULARVALUEIEXPOUNDTHEINDIVIDUALEFFORTWHICHDONGZHONGSHUHASMADETOPURSUETHEULTIMATEFOUNDATIONOFCONFUCIANPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY，ANDTHEEXISTENTIAL“VIEWWORLD”WHICHHEHASCONSTRUCTEDWITHGOD天ASITSCORGANDHISTHOUGHTOFINDUCTIONBETWEENGOD天ANDHUMANBYWHICHHEHASMADEHISDISCOURSESURPASSTHEAMBITOFTHEEXISTENTIALHORIZONCHAPTERIVIDISCUSSDONG’SHISTORICALJUSTIFICATIONFORTHEVALIDITYOFTEMPORALREGIMEINTHISCHAPTERIEXPOUNDDONG’SPOLITICALIDEAOFESTABLISHINGAKINDOFDIVINEPOLITICALETHICBYWHICHHEALLEGEDTHATREGALITYCOMEFROMGOD天THEDEMONSTRATIONOFTHISIDEAISRADICALLYBASEDUPONDONG’SSERIOUSATTITUDEONTHESIGNIFICATIONOFTHESACRIFICEFORGOD天ANDDONG’SAMBITIONOFEXPECTINGTOMOLDAKINDOFNATIONALMYTHOFETHICALRELIGIONHASBROUGHTSOCALLED“EXOTERICPOLITICS”ANDTHEINSTITUTIONALIZATIONOFCONFUCIANISMATLAST，IDISCUSSDONG’SINHERITINGANDDEVELOPINGOFTHETRADITIONALREVOLUTIONARYSPIRITOFCONFUCIANISM，ANDTHEFOREORDINATIONOFCONFUCIANWRITINGREVOLUTIONTENDINGTOWARDSDISCOURSEDESPOTISMINDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYKEYWORDSDONGZHONGSHU，CHUNQ掘FANLU，POLITICALPHILOSOPHYCONFUCIANISM2

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學(xué)校代碼10055密級公開高蕊犬淫碩士學(xué)位論文梁啟超政治法律思想及其哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)LIANGQICHAO’SPOLITICALLEGALTHOUGHTANDPHILOSOPHYFOUNDATION答辯委員會主席評閱人南開大學(xué)研究生院二。一。年十一月南開大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學(xué)位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。學(xué)位論文作者簽名崔鍪2010年11月26日非公開學(xué)位論文標注說明本頁表中填寫內(nèi)容須打印根據(jù)南開大學(xué)有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學(xué)位論文須經(jīng)指導(dǎo)教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準方能標注。未經(jīng)批準的均為公開學(xué)位論文，公開學(xué)位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20年月日至20年月日審批表編號批準日期20年月日南開大學(xué)學(xué)位評定委員會辦公室蓋章有效注限制★2年可少于2年秘密★10年可少于10年機密★20年可少于20年

簡介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文從哲學(xué)的角度思考當(dāng)代中國法治的合理性及其實現(xiàn)姓名譚振起申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李思孟20050501IIABSTRACTTHISPAPERUNDERTHEGUIDEOFHISTICALMATERIALISMFOCUSESONTHREERELATEDPROBLEMTHENEWUNDERSTINGOFESSENCEOFLAWFROMLAWTORULEOFLAWCHINESERULEOFLAWREALITYITHINKTHATBASICPOINTOFVIEWOFMARXISMISTHATLAWISIGINATEDFROMTHEECONOMICBASISWHICHISBASEDONTHELEVELOFPRODUCTIVITYTHISPOINTEXPOSESREASONABILITYOFLAWFROMREGULARITYOFLAWTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWINFACTCONTAINSACCDANCEWITHREASONABILITYWHICHISCONTENTOFPURPOSEOFMANMARXHIMSELFREGARDPRACTICINGSPIRITWAYASESSENCEOFLAWTHISPOINTWASNEGLECTEDBYTHEETICALCIRCLEWHICHISHELPFULTOUSTOUNDERSTTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWTHATRULEOFLAWFMEDINWESTERNSOCIETYISNOTINCIDENTALFROMTHEBEGINNINGOFWESTERNCULTUREANCIENTGREECEROMEHADNATURELAWTRADITIONOFADVOCATINGRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYTHESECONDPARTOFTHISPAPERDISCUSESTHEHISTYOFRULEOFLAWFROMTHEPOINTUNIFMOFHISTYLOGICASCONTRASTTHEPAPERDISCUSESTHEANCIENTCHINESETHOUGHTSOFLAWTHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENANCIENTCHINATHEWESTMANIFESTDIFFERENCEOFCULTURESTHEROOTLIESINTHEDIFFERENCEOFECONOMICLIFESTYLEDEVELOPMENTOFMARKETECONOMYMAKESTHESOCIALSUBJECTSFROMSTATUSTOCONTRACTWHICHATLASTLEADTORULEOFLAWNOWCHINAHASESTABLISHEDTHEAIMOFRULEOFLAWTHISISTHERESULTOFUNDERSTINGTHEIMPTANCEOFRULEOFLAWOTHERWISEITISTHEDEMOFSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYFURTHERMEECONOMICGLOBALIZATIONTHEENTRANCEOFWTOMAKESITINTERNATIONALDEMSCONSIDERINGCHINESEREALISTICSITUATIONTHEROADOFREALIZINGRULEOFLAWISAROADLEADINGBYTHEGOVERNMENTWHICHISDIFFERENTFROMTHEWESTERNKEYWDSCHINALAWRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYREALIZATION

簡介：西北大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文十七世紀西方數(shù)學(xué)的自然哲學(xué)背景沿著笛卡爾的“思”路姓名蒙虎申請學(xué)位級別博士專業(yè)科學(xué)技術(shù)史（數(shù)學(xué)史）指導(dǎo)教師李文林20030529ABSTRACTTAKINGTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSINWESTERNRATIONALTRADITIONASTHEBASICTHREADANDSPRINGBOARD，REVIEWINGTHEINFLUENCEOFREBOUNDOFTHEVIEWOFTHENATUREINGREECEANDRELIGIONATYREFORM，COMBININGTHECHARACTERISTICSOFTHE“SCIENCEOFQUANTUM”O(jiān)FWESTERNMATHEMATICSIN17THCENTURY,THEARTICLENOTONLYPROVIDESABUNDANTBLURRYCONTINUUMOFQUANTITYDIRECTLYANDDEFENDSFORTHE‘‘RATIONALITYOFARITHMETIC’’INDIRECTLYBUTALSOEXPATIATEDTHATTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICS甜ETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHENALNREANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEUNIVERSEHASAGREATINFLUENCEOVER17“CENTURY’S“MATHEMATICSOFARITHMETIC”，ESPECIALLYOVERTHEBIRTHANDTHEDEVELOPMENTOFANALYTICGEOMETRYANDCALCULUS．THEARTICLEGOESALONGCARTESIANTRAINOFTHOUGHTS，CLARIFIESTHATWHILETHENEWMATHEMATICSWHOSECOMMISSARYISCALCULUSISTHENEWBYPRODUCTOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INTHEWESTEN3TRADITIONALLOGES，THEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREAFTERREVIVALOFLEARNINGWHICHWASGREATLYINFLUENCEDBYTHEWESTERNLOGESOFTRADITIONHASALREADYFORMEDANEWEFFECTIVEWHYOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INWESTLOGESFROMTHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEWORLDTOTHEMATHEMATICATLONOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATURE．SOMEFAMOUSHISTORIANSOFSCIENCESUCHASBOTERANDA．KOYRDEMPHASIZEDTHATTHEOUTSTANDINGCHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICMATHEMATICSIS“MATHEMATICATION”INTHEIRSERIESOFCLASSICALBOOKSSUCHASTHEBASEOFNEOTERICPHYSICS∞METAPHYSICS．STUDYOFGALILEO,FROMTHECLOSEWORMTOTHEINFINITEUNIVERSE．PROFESSORWUGUOSHENGOFPHILNSOPHYDEPARTMENT,PEKINGUNIVERSITYALSOCONCENTRATEDONTHISISSUEINHISBOOKSSUCHASTHEERRORINNOUMENONOFTHENATURE，THERETREATOFTHENATURE，CONCEPTOFTIME．THEYDISCUSSEDTHEISSUEFROMASPECTSOFNEWPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEANDTHENATURE，CHARACTERISTICSOFPHYSICSPHILUSOPHYOFTHENATURE，ETC．THESAMETHINGOFTHESESCHELESSONTHISISSUEISTHATTHEYALLCONCENTRATEDONTHETHEORETICSURFACE．ASARESULT,WECALL’TSEETHEINFLUENCEOFSCIENTIFIC“MATHEMATIZATION’’ONTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSITSELF．THEARTICLETAKESMATHEMATIZATIONASTHECHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICSCIENCEBYSTARTINGFROMTHEBACKGROUNDOF17“CENTURY’SPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREANDREVIEWINGTHREEASPECTS．THESET11REEASPECTSATETHEMATHEMATIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHENATUREWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFPYTHAGORAS，THEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEWHICHISBASEDOOTHETRADITIONOFCHRISTIANISM，ANDTHEDEDUCTINGOFTHESYSTEMPHYSICSWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFEUCLID．ATTHESALTLETIME，THEPOINTTHATMUSTBECLARIFIEDISTHATTHEESTABLISHMENTOFTHENEWVIEWOFTHENATUREANDTHEBOOMINGOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFEREDTHENECESSARYQUALIFICATIONOFMATHEMATIZATION．AFTERANALYZINGTHEPROCESSOFMATHEMATIZATION，SEVERALCONCLUSIONSALESUMMEDUPASFOLLOWS．FIRST．WHILETHESUBJECTSINVEMIGATEDOF17“CENTURY，SMATHEMATICSINCLUDETHEMIXTUREOFTHESTRUCTUREOFSEQUENCE，THESTRUCTUREOFALGEBRAANDTHEFUZZYQUANTUMINTHESTRUCTURETOPOLOGY．ANDITISNOTHINGOTHERTHANTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICSARETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTTHATDEFENDSTHEEXISTENCEANDTHEPROPERTYOFTHISQUANTUMSECOND．THEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTWHICHAREEMPHASIZEDBYTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFERSAINTUITIONISTIEEONTINUUNWHICHTAKESTHEEXTENSIONOFTHESPACE．TIMEFORTHEBIRTHOFCALCULOUS．ITISNOTHINGELSETHANTHEDIVISION．THESUMMINGANDTHERATIOOFTHEINMITIONISTICCONTINUUNTHATBECOMETHEBASICMANNERINWHICH

簡介：西南師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文加繆的荒謬哲學(xué)思想研究姓名鄭國玉申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)外國哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師陶林崔延強20040601RESEARCHONCAMUS’THOUGHTOFABSURDITYMAJORWESTERNPHILOSOPHYSUPERVISORASSOCIATEPROFTANLINPROFCUIYANQIANGSPECIALTYWESTERNJURISPRUDENCEAUTHORZHENGGUOYU2001006ABSTRACTCAMUSISONEOFTHEOUTSTANDINGPERSONAGESWHOPROFOUNDLYEXPOSEABSURDITY“ABSURDITY’AND“REVOLT”ISAPAIROFCORECONCEPTSINCAMUS’WRITINGSTHEFORMERSUMSUPHISSOBERCONSCIOUSNESSOFMAN’SHELPLESSINFACEOFTHEWORLDANDEXISTENCE，ANDITALSODECONSTRUCTSTHECONFIDENCEINMAN’SPOWERSINCERENAISSANCE；THELATTERMAKESCLEARTHEPOSITIVEATTITUDEMANSHOULDHAVEWHENFACINGSUCHANEXISTENCEATTHESAMETIMEITISBOTHAHERITAGEANDMODEMINTERPRETATIONOFMANSDIGNITYANDPURSUITOFMORALITYINTRADITIONALHUMANISTICTHOUGHTSINTHETIDEOFMODEMNIHILISMCAMUS’THINKINGISAPERSISTENCEOFVALUABLELIFE，ANDALSOACONTRIBUTIONTOIDEOLOGY，INTHE20。CENTURYTLLISPASSAGEMAKESRESEARCHONHISTHOUGHTFROMFIVEPARTS，PARTITHEORIGINOFABSURDITYATFIRSTHISTORICALCIRCUMSTANCESOFWESTERNPOLITICSANDECONOMYAREDISCUSSEDRANGINGFROMTHEEARLY20“CENTURYTOTHEMIDDLEOFTHE20“THENTHISPARTINVESTIGATESTHESOURCEOFTHEORYANDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENCARABSANDEXISTENTIALISMPARTIITHETHEORYOFABSURDITYTHISPARTISTHEFOCALMINTOFTHISWRITINGFIRSTTHISPARTCONFIRMSCAMUS’POSITIONINTHEHISTORYOFPHILOSOPHYANDLITERATURETHEN，BEGINNINGWITHANALYZINGHISWORKSOFPHILOSOPHYANDLITERATURE，ITDISCUSSESTHEFEELINGANDCONCEPTOFABSURDITYGIVINGOUTTHECAUSESOFBEINGABSURDANDSPECIFICADPEARANCESINREALLIREATLASTITPRESENTSTHEATTITUDEOFRESISTANCETOABSURDITYANDTHELIMITTOITPANⅡITHEDIFFERENCESOFPHILOSOPHYBETWEENCAMUSANDSAMETHISPARTMAINLYDISCUSSESTHEDIFIERENTOPINIONOFABSURDITYFREEDOMANDCOMMONHUMANNATUREBETWEENTHEMANDITALSODISCUSSESTHEDIFFERENTATTITUDETODEALINGWITHTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENINDIVIDUALSANDOTHERSASWELLASTHEARGUMENTBETWEENTHEMONFIGHTERSPARTIVREFLECTIONONABSURDITYINCAMUS’POLITICALPOINTSTHISPARTDISCUSSESTHEREFLECTIONINCAMUS’THOUGHTSAGAINSTFASCISM，LEGALVIOLENCEANDDEATHPENALTYANDITSHOWSTHEPROCESSOFFORMATIONOFTHESEVIEWPOINTSPARTVTHINKINGFREELYOFCAMUS’THOUGHTTHISPARTTRIESTOINVESTIGATETHEREALISTICMEANINGSOFCAMUS’THINKINGFROMTHESENSEANDVALUEOFE虹STENCEOFLIFETHATBEINGABSURDINTENDSTOPURSUITTHISPARTATTEMPTSTOINVESTIGATEITSMEANINGANDINFLUENCEKEYWORDSABSURDITYCONSCIOUSNESSRESISTANCEFIGHTERFREEDOMCOMMONHUMANNATURE

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學(xué)校代碼10055密級公開高恐犬法碩士學(xué)位論文晏陽初平民教育思想的哲學(xué)思考。PHILOSOPHYTHINKINGINYANYANGCHU’SCOMMONEREDUCATIONTHOUGHTS答辯委員會主席菱藍送南開大學(xué)研究生院二。一一年十月南開大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學(xué)位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。學(xué)位論文作者簽名鄞室2011年11月28日非公開學(xué)位論文標注說明本頁表中填寫內(nèi)容須打印根據(jù)南開大學(xué)有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學(xué)位論文須經(jīng)指導(dǎo)教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準方能標注。未經(jīng)批準的均為公開學(xué)位論文，公開學(xué)位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20年月日至20年月日審批表編號批準日期20年月日南開大學(xué)學(xué)位評定委員會辦公室蓋章有效注限制★2年可少于2年秘密★10年可少于10年機密★20年可少于20年

簡介：東南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文基因?qū)＠舾蓡栴}的哲學(xué)思考姓名黃步龍申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師葉明20041222THEDEVELOPMENTOFTECHNOLOGYOFGENEHASASTRONGIMPACTONTRADITIONALGENESYSTEM．THEREARESOMEPHILOSOPHICALISSUESABOUTGENERELATEDPATENT．DOESGENELISTBELONGTOINVENTIONORDISCOVERERMAYTHEPEOPLEWHOOFFERGENERESOURCEGOSHARESBENEFITOFGENERELATEDPATENTWITHTHEINVENTORISTHEGENERELATEDPATENTIMPARTIALORNOT,ETC．THEPAPERISABOUTTHESEISSUES．THISPAPERANALYSESTHESEPHILOSOPHICALISSUESSURROUNDINGTHEAIMANDCHARACTERISTICOFTHEPATENTSYSTEM．THEAIMOFLAWMAKINGOFPATENTLAWISUTILITARIAN．THETHEORYOFBENEFITBALANCEISTHEBASEOFTHEORYOFINTELLIGENCELAWINCLUDINGPATENTLAW．FIRSTLY,ABOUTTHEINVENTIONOFGENELIST,THISPAPERANALYSESPUZZLEABOUTTHEINVENTIONANDDISCOVEREROFGENELIST，ANDLOOKSBACKUNDERSTANDINGPROCESSOFSOMECOUNTRIESINTHEISSUESABOUTNARLVDLMATTERPATENT．THISPAPERALSOANALYSESTHESEISSUESFROMTHEAIMOFPATENTSYSTEM,THEPOLICYOFSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY,INDUSTRYOFSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY．TOUNDERSTANDTHEGENEINNATURALSTATEISSCIENTIFICDISCOVERER．BUTALTERBEINGSEPARATEDANDBEINGMADEPURE，THEGENELISTCANBEUSEDININDUSTRY．SOTHEGENELISTISAKINDOFINVENTION．11

簡介：R768932學(xué)校編號；Q學(xué)號2002017密級圖書分類號I630／01福建師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文關(guān)于全面建設(shè)小康社會進程中保護私有財產(chǎn)的哲學(xué)審視PHILOSOPHICCOMPREHENSIONABOUTPROTECTINGTHEPDVATEPROPERTYINTHEPROCESSOFBUILDINGLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETY張愛豐學(xué)科專業(yè)墨壺墨圭邈蜇堂研究方向經(jīng)進蜇雯指導(dǎo)教師基垂羞塾援申請學(xué)位級別蜇堂亟論文提交日期至壘壁曼笙璺且論文評閱人論文答辯日期答辯委員會主席學(xué)位授予單位學(xué)位授予日期2005年4月擅蕉婭蒸盎堂至壘Q曼生曼旦SYNOPSISTOBUILDALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYWENEEDTOESTABLISHANDIMPROVETHESYSTEMOFMODERNPMPERTYRIGHTANDPROTECTTHELEGALPRIVATEPROPERTYOFTHESOCIALISTSOCIETYTHISARTICLEMAINLYEXPOUNDSTHEFACLABOUTPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYINTHEPROCESSOFBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYINTERMSOFECONOMICPHILOSOPHYTHEPRIVATEPROPE啊OFTHESOCIALISTSOCIETYINCLUDESTHEPRIVATELYOWNEDPROPERTYANDTHEPRIVATELYOCCUPIEDPROPERTYTHEPRIVATELYOWNEDPROPRIETARYINCLUDESOWNERSHIPANDPOSSESSIONTHESOCIALISTPRIVATEPROPERTYHASITSOWNSPECIALCHARACTERSTHEREAREMANYDISCUSSIONSOFPRIVATEPROPERTYBOTHJNCHINAANDTHEWESTSOCIETYALTHOUGHTHESEDISCUSSIONSHAVETHEIROWNHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYBASISTHEYCANDOHELPTOOURBUILDINGA_ROUNDWELLOFFSOOIETYTHEMARXISMCLASSICAUTHORSHADEXPOUNDEDTHECERTAINTYOFTHEPROTECTIONOFPRIVATEPROPERTYUNDERSPECIALCONDITIONSONTHEBASISOFCRITICIZINGANDINHERITINGOTHERSTHEPHILOSOPHYBASISOFPROTECTINGPRIVATEPROPERTYLIESINTHEPRACTICEOFBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYATTHEPRESENTSTAGEWESHOULDPROTECTPRIVATEPROPERTYACCORDINGTOTHENEEDOFIMPROVINGTHESOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYSYSTEM，BUILDINGSOCIALISTPOLITICSCIVILIZATIONFOLLOWINGTHERULEOFDEVELOPMENTOFTHEPROPERTYCARRYINGOUTTHESCIENTIFICDEVELOPMENTVIEWANDSTRUCTURINGTHEHARMONIOUSSOCIETYSOWEMUSTTAKETHEEFFECTIVEMEASURESTOPROTECTTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYWESHOULDCHANGETHEVIEWNOTSUITABLEOFTHEPRACTICE，PERFECTTHELEGALSYSTEMANDSETDOWNTHECORRESPONDINGPOLICIESTOPROTECTTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYINTHECOURSEOFPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYWENEEDTOHANDLEWELLTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPUBLICPROPERTYANDPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYANDADHERINGTOTHESOCIALISTSYSTEMSANDTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYANDADHERINGTOCOMMUNISMIDEALANDVALUESKEYWORDSBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETY；PRIVATEPROPERTY；PHILOSOPHY；CONNOTATION；INEVITABILITY；MEASURES；QUESTIONS

簡介：華東政法學(xué)院碩士學(xué)位論文哲學(xué)解釋學(xué)視野下的法律解釋分析姓名朱曉松申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師李桂林20050425解釋中的前理解和視域融合、法律解釋中的自由裁量權(quán)等三個方面對法律解釋理論的動態(tài)性、創(chuàng)造性和探究性做了具體和完整的分析，尤其突出了法官在法律適用中的作用。本文的第三章通過對中國法律解釋體制的分析，指出我國的法律解釋體制是多元多級的、以立法者為中心的法律解釋體制。并分析了這種體制形成的原因。通過分析，結(jié)合哲學(xué)解釋學(xué)理淪，作者提出了兩點完善我國法律解釋體制的建議。在簡短的余論部分里，作者簡要地對法官的自身品格作了說明，因為無論一種理論多么的完善，最終都要落實到具體的人身上。作為法律解釋的主體，法官的自身素質(zhì)顯的尤為重要。