版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、The study attempts to test the following hypotheses:(1)There are significant differences in two kinds of information units(low-level and high-level information units)and the combined information units recalled by the sub
2、jects between two lecture versions;(2)There are significant differences in two kinds of information units(low-level and high-level information units)and combined information units recalled by two performance groups(Mediu
3、m Performance Group vs. High Performance Group );(3)There are interactions between language proficiency and lecture version in recalling information at different levels;(4)The learners with lower listening proficiency r
4、ely more heavily on discourse markers in recalling information at different levels than those with higher listening proficiency. The present study involves 56 students with medium listening proficiency and 59 student
5、s with high listening proficiency from a university in China. It examines how the subjects comprehend and recall information at different levels when listening to a lecture with discourse markers or without discourse mar
6、kers. The detailed analysis of the data yields the following findings: (1)L2 learners listening to the lecture with discourse markers recall significantly more low-level information, more high-level information and m
7、ore combined information than EFL learners exposed to the lecture without discourse markers. (2)Learners at a higher level of listening proficiency recall significantly more low-level, high-level and combined informa
8、tion than learners with a lower proficiency. (3)There are no statistically significant interactio.ns between listening proficiency and lecture version for the subjects in recalling low and high-level information as w
9、ell as combined information. (4)Compared with learners with higher listening proficiency, learners with lower listening proficiency rely more heavily on discourse markers in recalling low-level information and combin
10、ed information. However, in terms of high-level informationrecall, High Performance Group rely on discourse markers just as Medium Performance Group. These findings provide additional empirical support for the benef
11、icial effect of discourse markers and offer new evidence regarding the different extent to which the learners with different language proficiency rely on discourse markers in a spoken text. In line with the findings
12、in the study, the teaching of the use of discourse markers is highly advocated in English listening instructions. And teachers are encouraged to raise the awareness of the role of discourse markers in listening among les
13、s able students as a way of improving their listening comprehension. Finally, future research is suggested to examine the role of discourse markers from different perspectives and further studies are called for to pr
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 話語標記語與EFL聽力理解.pdf
- 話語標記語的語境提示及其在聽力理解中的應(yīng)用.pdf
- 話語標記語在大學(xué)生聽力理解中的功能研究.pdf
- 二語聽力篇章中的話語標記語.pdf
- 論二語聽力策略及其對二語聽力理解的影響.pdf
- 話語標記語在中國大學(xué)生聽力理解過程中的作用.pdf
- 語塊教學(xué)對學(xué)生聽力理解影響的研究.pdf
- 書面語篇話語標記語的元功能及對大學(xué)英語閱讀理解的指導(dǎo).pdf
- 話語標記語與話語連貫的研究.pdf
- 課堂話語標記語的語篇功能.pdf
- 從語篇理解角度解析話語標記——分析《白象似的群山》.pdf
- 語篇標記對高中生英語閱讀理解影響的研究.pdf
- 話語標記語的關(guān)聯(lián)理論闡釋.pdf
- 引述類話語標記語考察.pdf
- 話語標記語的順應(yīng)理論闡釋.pdf
- 話語標記語WELL的語用分類.pdf
- 話語標記語“我們知道”的研究.pdf
- 話語標記語的語用特征分析.pdf
- 話語標記語的順應(yīng)—關(guān)聯(lián)闡釋.pdf
- 話語標記語I suppose.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論