同學(xué)互改在高中英語寫作教學(xué)中的實施現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查研究.pdf

1、學(xué)校代碼：』Qi盟分類號：￡絲ZY887723研冗生學(xué)號：!Q!QQ2QQ!!絲密級：玉⑤東北師葒大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文同學(xué)互改在高中英語寫作教學(xué)中的實施現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查研究AnhvestigationintotheImplementationofPeerReViewonEnglishWritingofSecondaryL2Learne聃指導(dǎo)教師：學(xué)科專業(yè)：研究方向：學(xué)位類型：作者：魏巍王啟燕副教授課程與教學(xué)論英語教學(xué)論學(xué)歷碩士東北師范大學(xué)學(xué)位評定委

2、員會2006年5月AbsnactSincetheapplicationoftllencwlyp啪嘰lgatedStaIldardofEn甜ishCurriculum，血epmcessapproac：hofwrit幻ghasrcceivedmoreandmoreattentionineducation丘eldThisappmachindudesnotonlyteachers’comments，butals0peerreVieVnThou曲

3、itiswidelyacccptedin血eWest，connic血g石ndiIl窟shavebeenfoundiIlreseafchesInChilla，tlleresearchesi11thisfieldarelimited，especial王yinse∞ndaryschoolsOurtradmonOfteachingisteachercentered，whic：hmeans0nlVteac：herShavetheauthority

4、teviewstudents’comDositio璐andsttldemsareusedt0itThisresearchstudiestheresultsof。twoquestiollⅡaircsandtwoseriesofiIlterviews西vento10teachersand50studentSoftheMiddleSchoolACtachedt0North∞stNo聊alUlliversityrespectively’anda

5、imstoanswerthefollowingthreequestions：1DosecoⅡdaryL2writersbencfitf幻mpeerreview2H0wdostudentsconsiderpeerreviewandteachercommentsIstheresi月皿ificantdi￡I’erencebetweenthetⅣoattitIldes3Whatarctheproblemswhilepeerreviewisapp

6、liedinsecondarVschoolsIowtOavoidorsolvetheseDroblemsFirst，aquestio衄ajresurveVwasadmiⅡis拓atedto也e10teacherst0f缸douttherealsituationofpeerreviewiIltllesch001TWoweeksafterthesurvevtheresearcherpickedsixteachers丘OmmemtodOsom

7、einten，iewsino坩crtogeta唧prehensivercsunThenanotIlerquestio加airewasgiventothe50studcntswhosedasshadappliedpeerreviewmostfrequcntlyAlso，someinterviewswcredoneaddmonallytostudystIldents’acceptanceofpeerreviewandtheirattjtud

8、estowardstcachefs’commentsTheresuhsshowtllatpeerre們ewisnotwidelvusedmEn91ishwritinEofsecondarv12leamersH0wever，thisapproachhassomefoundationintlleflltIlrepracticebecauseteachefsconsideritusefulMeanwhile，thestudValseveals

9、thatpeerreviewstiuhassomeproblemsinapplication，iIldudingnouⅡi6edstaⅡdard，limitedtiⅡle，lafgestudcnt肌mber，uneVenEnglishlevels，distrustbetweenstudentSandmostlv丹ⅫmmarfbcusedTeachefs’commentsaremorepreferablecomparedtopeerrev

10、iewbecauseOfteachers’author“yAIldthequestionnairealsoshowedthatstudentsdonOttllillkthat口eerreviewismostlyfocusedonI，aInmar，wllichconflictsteadlerS’0pinionsTbefese趕cheraIlalVzesthedataanddiscussesmereasOnsoftheseproblcmsS

11、uggestionsaregiven，includiⅡgaunificdstan刪ofpecrreView，traillillgofpeerreviewandtrcatiⅡgitastlle咖npl哪entOfteachers’commcntSBasedonthediscussion，theresearchrevealsthatthereisfeasibilityforpeerreviewtobeappliedillEn班shwIiti

12、ⅡgofsecondaryL2learIlers111eresearcherhopesthatmoreresearc血escanbedoneint11isfIeldAl出ou曲limitationexjsts，矗ndingsthatjtrepoftscanbeusefllliIlwritin疊teaching0fsecondarysch001sKeywords：En出ishwritingofsecondaryschools；peerre