版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、廣西師范大學碩士學位論文研究生學術誠信問題的博弈分析姓名:朱月晨申請學位級別:碩士專業(yè):馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導教師:楊乃良20060401研究生學術誠信問題的博弈分析 The game analysis of postgraduate academic integrityIIAbstractThe academic integrity of the current graduate students conducted a s
2、urvey study,recognizing that thepost- graduate Academic credit exist,and cited deficiencies in the integrity of the academic status of graduatestudents, such as forged experimental data, copied others academic results,fa
3、bricate references, examinationfraud,papers signed exchange,as gunmen. This article describes in detail the findings and the basis of publicinformation, confirmed the existence of postgraduate academic integrity deficien
4、cies. This phenomenon affectsthe quality of postgraduate training,hindering their academic road development; Impact of the social functionof a university, the University community confidence gradually reduced,and increas
5、ed social deterioration.It always exist internal causes in reality. This article is based on rational assumptions of postgraduatelimited basis,the use of game theory “ prisoners dilemma”and repeat the game some perspecti
6、ve,a model foranalysis. Postgraduate Academic credit is a transition period of social factors. When graduate students face“ prisoners dilemma” , the impact of its academic choice “ not honest”reasons attributed to the th
7、ree categories:First, social macro- environment,with postgraduate academic acts have direct contact with social factors, suchas social integrity of cultural, academic journals, employment opportunities, reflected in the
8、graduate andacademic periodicals exchange between the interests of the game,in the employment of resources to capturethe game,and cultural integrity of the mutual influence the game;Second,under colleges and universities
9、environment,graduate students in colleges and universities and post- graduate academic evaluation systembetween instructors and psychological game,although academic performance and evaluation indicators forpostgraduate b
10、argaining game with the academic integrity of educators copied game;Third,Graduate groupsatmosphere blind comparison of academic results and academic integrity among graduate academic integrityof misconduct is also anoth
11、er reason for the formation of strategic deficiencies.In view of this,this should be raised for the building of systems from three to solve this problem. Socialenvironment,it is necessary to purify the atmosphere and cre
12、ate a universal moral integrity of the academicintegrity and standardize the current academic journals improper market behavior; Colleges and universities inthe circumstances, should improve existing postgraduate trainin
13、g system, a graduate student living professors,graduate students strengthen the integrity of education to firmly establish the concept of integrity,theestablishment of an effective academic evaluation mechanisms,and the
14、academic community to the internaland external oversight of postgraduate tutors;Graduate groups within postgraduate training within theacademic community should strengthen self- discipline academic integrity.The adoption
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 高校研究生學術誠信研究.pdf
- 大數(shù)據(jù)視域下高校研究生學術誠信問題研究
- 研究生學術誠信的自律與意義
- 研究生學術誠信教育研究.pdf
- 39148.誠信視角下高校研究生的學術道德問題研究
- 高校研究生學術誠信培育的路徑探析
- 危機與應對:研究生學術誠信建設研究.pdf
- 誠信視野下研究生學術道德建設研究.pdf
- 美國研究生學術誠信制度及其啟示研究.pdf
- 71361.美國研究生“學術誠信項目”研究
- 對研究生科學道德與學術誠信的思考
- 研究生學術不端問題探究
- 體育院校研究生學術誠信調(diào)查及教育對策研究.pdf
- 研究生學術道德失范問題研究.pdf
- 研究生學術道德失范問題研究
- 高校研究生學術道德不端行為問題的研究.pdf
- 研究生學術道德現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查與問題研究.pdf
- 工科研究生學術失范問題研究.pdf
- 34460.研究生學術責任缺失問題研究
- 研究生學術道德研究.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論