“風(fēng)險社會”下抽象危險犯擴(kuò)張的正當(dāng)性根據(jù).pdf

1、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明：所提交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作和取得的研究成果。本論文中除引文外，所有實(shí)驗(yàn)、數(shù)據(jù)和有關(guān)材料均是真實(shí)的。本論文中除引文和致謝的內(nèi)容外，不包含其他人或其它機(jī)構(gòu)已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果。其他同志對本研究所做的貢獻(xiàn)均己在論文中作了聲明并表示了謝意。學(xué)位敝儲擻：夏強(qiáng)日期：2。降夠t桫學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)聲明y糍臻懸囂r簽蓋一／g日期：力腳心膳日期：2孵秒歲Abs仃actAbstractAfterth

2、eperiodofsocialdevelopmenttoindustrial，socialscienceandtechnologyhasbroughttomankindendlessconvenience，butalsobroughtavarietyofsocialrisks，whichthefamousGermansociologistUlrichBeckcalled”risksociety”Whetherourcountryhase

3、ntereda”risksociety”iscontroversialincriminallawscholarsWiththedevelopmentofsocietyandeconomytherisksfloodtheentirecommunityandsocialriskshavealsoincreasedthespreadofthecharacteristicsofourcountry’Ssocialrisks，whichhavep

4、rovedthatChinahasentereda”risksociety”Inordertomaximizethepotentialforthepreventionandcontrolofvarioussocialrisks，countriesaroundtheworldareactivelytosetuptheabstractdangerouscrimes，abstractdangerouscrimesinthecriminalla

5、wincludingChinaPerilousabstractriskmanagementandcontrolinsecurityhascertainrationality：AbstractPotentialDamagecanbemorecircumspectprotectionoflegalinterests；abstractdangerouscrimeshasuniquefunctionsofcontrollingpollution

6、crime；socialeffectshavealsoappearedtheadvantagesofdangerouscrimesHowever，therelationshipbetweentheabstracttheoryandthetraditionaltheoryofcriminallawPerilousisintensionandtheoverextensionofitselfisakindofabstractdangerous

7、crimesdangerousThus，ontheonehandthisexpansionshoulddefinitelylegitimacyontheotherhanditshouldbestrictlylimitedexpansionoftheboundariesofabstractdangerouscrimesFoundofabstractpotentialdamageoffenseCanbelimitedfrom‘threeas

8、pectsincriminallaw：theneedtoensuretheprotectionofthecriminallaw，legislationshouldfulfilltheresponsibilitiesofplayingwellthecharacterofguardwhenabstractpotentialdamageWasdefinedinlegislationInlegislation，onlytypicalriskyb

9、ehaviorshouldbeconsideredwhenthelawiswrittenbylegislator；Thereshouldbemorelighterpunishmentbecauseofnoactualagainstlawresultfromabstractpotentialdamage；Abstractpotentialdamageoffense’Ssubjectivesinshouldbelimitedtotheint