中美涉疆新聞中概念隱喻的評(píng)價(jià)功能對比分析_6492.pdf

1、碩士研究生學(xué)位論文新疆大學(xué)論文題目論文題目(中文中文)：中美涉疆新聞中概念隱喻的評(píng)價(jià)功能對比：中美涉疆新聞中概念隱喻的評(píng)價(jià)功能對比分析分析論文題目論文題目(外文外文)：AComparativeAnalysisoftheDifferentEvaluativeFunctionsofConceptualMetaphsinChineseAmericanXinjiangrelatedNews研究生姓名：郭越研究生姓名：郭越學(xué)科、專業(yè)：外國語言文學(xué)

2、學(xué)科、專業(yè)：外國語言文學(xué)研究方向：外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)向：外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)導(dǎo)師姓名職稱：蘭杰導(dǎo)師姓名職稱：蘭杰教授教授論文答辯日期2016年5月29日學(xué)位授予日期年月日IIAbstractEverypartofdiscoursecontainsnotonlymeaningsbutalsoevaluation.MartinputfwardAppraisalTheytostudytheevaluationattitudesettin

3、gthroughlanguage.Asalanguageresourceusedbypeopleindailylivesmetaphsareusuallyendowedwithcertainevaluativemeaningsintheprocessofinteractiontoexpresssubjectiveattitudesopinionsofthewriterspeaker.Peopleuseconcreteobjectsabs

4、tractconceptsspacialientationshumanbodiestoexpressattitudesindifferentintensityleadingtotheaccomplishmentofevaluativefunctionsofmetaphs.Thisallowsftheargumentthatmetaphsareofevaluativefunctions.Thisthesisanalysesthefrequ

5、encyofconceptualmetaphsin34piecesofXinjiangrelatednewsfromChinaDailyNewYkTimesintheperiodof20082013.BasedonAppraisalTheythisthesisinvestigatesthesimilaritiesdifferencesoftheevaluativefunctionsamongdifferentconceptualmeta

6、phsinAttitudeEngagementGraduationSystems.Finallyitexplesthemotivesofthetwonewspapers.ThroughcomparativestudiesitisfoundthattheconceptualmetaphsidentifiedinbothChinaDailyNewYkTimesprimarilysharethesimilaritiesofevaluative

7、functionsasfollows:firstlythetypesofconceptualmetaphsappearinbothnewspapersaresimilarsecondlythenewsreptersinbothnewspapersemploymeOntologicalMetaphsespeciallyHumanContainerMetaphstorealizetheirevaluativemeaningsthirdlyt

8、hegeneraldistributionofevaluativeresourcesreflectsaconcentrationontheAttitudeSystemmainlyinthesubsystemofJudgmentfourthlyintheEngagementSystemtheconceptualmetaphsarepreferredtobepresentedintheExpansionSystemfifthlyintheG

9、raduationSystemconceptualmetaphsareexclusivelyintheFceSystemtheFocusSystemisoutofconsideration.OntheotherhthereexistfivemaindifferencesabouttheevaluativefunctionsofconceptualmetaphsofChinaDailyNewYkTimes:firstlyoverallth