大學(xué)英語(yǔ)作文中詞匯搭配錯(cuò)誤的分析.pdf

1、Collocations are fixed, identifiable, and non-idiomatic phrases and constructions.Though they are exiremely important in language learning, studies in this field arerelatively few in our country and trainings concerning

2、this aspect of linguistic proficiencyare inadequate in course books. Moreover, collocaitonal errors have been one major typeof lexical errors; and these errors often lead to Qingltsh. In order to explore the sourcesof th

3、ese errors and therefore propose ways of remedy and prevention, we conduct anempirical stuay on the collocational errors in EFL compositions. By this error analysis,we wani to address the following issues: (1) the distri

4、bution of errors of lexicalcollocations; (2) the underlying cause of errors in different error categories; (3) remedialstrategies and various ways to improve learners' proficiency in this regard. To achievethese goals, w

5、e first give a critical review of recent researches on lexical collocation. Asthere is a confusing glut of information of EA, a delimitation of some key concepts ismade to facilitate our study. The findings of error anal

6、ysis show that errors are mainlyconcentrated in the category of assumed synonyms. This is either because many of thesesynonyms share the same Chinese equivalent and therefore learners tend to think they areinterchangeabl

7、e in collocations, or because students equate these words with theirChinese counterparts, neglecting their difference in syntactic behavior. We explore theseerrors from various perspectives and Nan Jiang's theory is part

8、icularly revealing. Itshede light on errors from a representational point of view Finally, the pedagogicalimplications of this study are discussed. We conclude that lack of contextualized inputand over-reliance on L1 tra