我國刑法中主客觀相統(tǒng)一的定罪原則研究.pdf

1、 1 內(nèi)容摘要 內(nèi)容摘要 我國刑法中主客觀相統(tǒng)一的定罪原則是我國司法實(shí)務(wù)部門普遍遵守的基本原則之一。但我國刑法規(guī)范并未對(duì)之予以具體規(guī)定，理論界對(duì)該原則的研究也不深入。如何在構(gòu)建刑事法治的背景下理解主客觀相統(tǒng)一的定罪原則，并充分發(fā)揮其保障人權(quán)、限制司法權(quán)濫用的功能是刑法理論研究中亟待解決的問題。 筆者在評(píng)析我國主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則形成過程的基礎(chǔ)上，充分闡述了該原則的內(nèi)涵及與其他定罪原則的區(qū)別，分析了我國主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則本身所存在的缺陷

2、及解決方案， 最后用主客觀不一致情形下該原則的有效適用來驗(yàn)證上述解決方案的科學(xué)性。 本文除引言外，由四個(gè)部分構(gòu)成，共計(jì) 4 萬字左右，其主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分：我國刑法中主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則的形成機(jī)制分析。這一部分通過對(duì)主客觀相統(tǒng)一的定罪原則與主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則之間的關(guān)系分析， 得出二者在含義上基本一致的結(jié)論。然后通過分析說明該原則來源于蘇聯(lián)刑法典及其犯罪構(gòu)成理論體系，可追溯至特拉伊寧對(duì)費(fèi)爾巴哈犯罪構(gòu)成理論的正確批判。 緊接著進(jìn)一步分析

3、說明了形成之初的主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則只是一個(gè)機(jī)械僵硬的外殼， 隨著刑事立法的完善和刑法學(xué)理論的發(fā)展，該原則已經(jīng)完全適應(yīng)了我國的國情。 第二部分：我國刑法中主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則的一般理論。這一部分首先對(duì)主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則的理論爭議進(jìn)行了評(píng)析，然后通過對(duì)“定罪” 、 “主觀” 、 “客觀”等基本概念的含義的分析，將主客觀相統(tǒng)一的定罪原則的內(nèi)涵界定為：在查清案件事實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行定罪活動(dòng)時(shí)， 法官應(yīng)當(dāng)以法律規(guī)定的主客觀相統(tǒng)一的犯罪構(gòu)成這一定罪

4、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為依據(jù)，正確理解犯罪構(gòu)成各要件及其關(guān)系，通過被審理行為各要素與刑法規(guī)定進(jìn)行符合性判斷，認(rèn)定被審理行為的性質(zhì)。緊接著從定罪原則的角度出發(fā)，指出客觀歸罪、主觀歸罪、客觀主義、主觀主義只根據(jù)主觀或客觀一方面定罪，沒有正確認(rèn)識(shí)主觀與客觀的辯證關(guān)系，是片面的，我國主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則強(qiáng)調(diào)刑事責(zé)任的基礎(chǔ)是主觀要件與客觀要件的辯證統(tǒng)一，是全面的、科學(xué)的定罪原則。 第三部分：我國刑法中主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原則的缺陷及完善。這一部分解決主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原

5、則內(nèi)涵下犯罪構(gòu)成四要件如何辯證統(tǒng)一的問題。 我國主客觀相統(tǒng)一定罪原1 Abstract The principle of subjective and objective’s unification for conviction is one of basic principles complied with the judicial department of our country, but the criminal code o

6、f our country doesn’t make specific rules for it, and the academia doesn’t study it comprehensively and thoroughly. How to understand this principle at the background of criminal law’s ruling and make it play a role in s

7、afeguarding right and restricting power is an urgent subject in the theoretical study of criminal law. On the basis of evaluating the views about its formation process, the auther illuminates this principle’s connotation

8、 and difference detailedly, points its defects and puts forward solution. Finally, inconsistency of subjective and objective verifies the solution’s scientificity. There are four parts except introduction, a total of ab

9、out 40,000 words, and its main contents are as follows: The first part: the analysis about formation mechanism of the principle of subjective and objective’s unification for conviction in our country. After analysis, sub

10、jective and objective unification principle had the same meaning with this principle. The principle of subjective and objective’s unification for conviction comes from the Soviet Union’s criminal law and criminal constit

11、ution theory, dating back to penologist’s correct criticism about Feuerbach’s criminal constitution theory. At the early stage of the principle of subjective and objective’s unification for conviction in our country, the

12、 principle is just an apuppet. With the development of criminal legislation and criminal theory, this principle has fit our country’s situation. The second part: General theory about the principle of subjective and objec

13、tive’s unification for conviction in our country. Although our crininal law doesn’t make rules for this principle, there are many rules of criminal law reflecting it. Considering the formation mechanism, criminal rules’

14、reflection, the basic idea of criminal law ruling, the connotation of conviction, objective and subjective, the connotation of the principle of subjective and objective’s unification for conviction should be define as fo

15、llows: when determining the nature of harmful behavior after finding out the case facts, the judge should understand the criminal constitution elements and their relations correctly according to the legal criminal const