比較法視野下的違約非財(cái)產(chǎn)損害賠償.pdf

1、蘇州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文比較法視野下的違約非財(cái)產(chǎn)損害賠償姓名：夏萬(wàn)宏申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：國(guó)際法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：陳立虎20090401AbstractNonpecuniaryDamagesforBreachofContract：AComparativeLawPerspectiveNonpecuniaryDamagesforBreachofContract：AComparativeLawPerspectiveAbstractNonpecunia

2、rydamagesforbreachofcontracthasbeenanarguablebutstillunreslvoablelegalissue，onwhichscholarsaredividedintotwoconflictgroupsSomeholdthetraditionalslraJ，cethatnonpecuniarydamagescannotberecoverableonthebasisofcontractualres

3、ponsibilityotherslatelyhaveshowntheirdisagreementOnthisstrange，intheiropinion，contractualremediesshouldalsobegiventononpecuniarylossesFromtheperspectiveofcomparativelawthisdissertationintroducesandanalyzessimilaritiesand

4、differencesofthepatterntoprotectnonpecuniarylossesofrepresentativecountries，50astogivereferencestoChineselegalreformInthepresentsituation，EnglishandAmericanlawdoesn’tacknowledgenon—pecuniarydamagesincontractlawonprincipl

5、e，butcommonlawcountrieshavesetsomeexceptionsinparticularcircumstancesInGermancivillawintherangeoflegalinterestsofbodyhealth，libertyandsexualselfdetermination，nonpecuniarylossescallbeprotectedoncontractualbasis，andthere’r

6、enocontractualremediestootherlegalinterestsInFrenchlawcontractualdamagescarlbebothintheformofpecuniaryandnon—pecuniarylosses，SOnonpecuniarydamagescanbegenerallyestablishedinthecommoncontractlawDuetoambiguityoflegislation

7、andlegaltheoryChinesejudicialpracticemanifestschaosindifferentlevelsand11011pecuniarylossescannotbeprotectedreasonablyChineselegalsystemofnon—pecuniarydamagesneedstobereformedurgentlyLegislativestylesofthoserepresentativ

8、ecountriesprovidehelpfulreferencestoChineselegalreformHoweveronlyonthebasisofChineseactualconditions，reasonablewaystoprotectnonpecuniarycallbefound，thustomeetthedemandsofsocialandeconomicdevelopmentKeywords：Nonpecuniaryl