軟學(xué)科和硬學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要中介入資源的對(duì)比分析——以經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和工程學(xué)為例_16670.pdf

1、暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文題名（中英對(duì)照）：AContrastiveAnalysisofEngagementResourcesbetweenSoftDisciplinesHardDisciplinesRAAsWithaparticularreferencetoEconomicsEngineeringRAAs軟學(xué)科和硬學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)論文摘要中介入資源的對(duì)比分析以經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和工程學(xué)為例作者姓名：劉文姣指導(dǎo)教師姓名及學(xué)位、職稱(chēng)：王全智博士

2、副教授學(xué)科、專(zhuān)業(yè)名稱(chēng)：外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)位類(lèi)型：學(xué)術(shù)學(xué)位論文提交日期：2015年月日論文答辯日期：2015年月日答辯委員會(huì)主席：論文評(píng)閱人：學(xué)位授予單位和日期：暨南大學(xué)暨南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文IAbstractAbstractsanacademicgenreserveasatimesaverindexresearchenginebecauseitisthethresholdtoafullarticleaffdingtoreaderst

3、hemaincontentinfmation.Readers’furtherreadingdependstoagreatextentonasuccessfulconstructionofanabstract.Suchadramaticallyimptantroledoesanabstractplayinanarticlethatresearcharticlewritershavetoputarduousefftsinexaminingi

4、tsmicrolinguisticdevices.Althoughitiswidelyheldthatthespecificdisciplinarityofaparticulardisciplineinfluencesgreatlyitscommunitymembers’choicesoflinguisticdeviceswhentheyconstructresearcharticleabstracts(RAAs)ftheaccepta

5、ncefromtheirowncommunitythestudiesontheengagementresourcesofRAAsofdifferentdisciplinesarestillfewfarbetween.OnthebasisofMartin’sappraisaltheythepresentthesisistorevealthesimilaritiesdissimilaritiesofengagementresourcesbe

6、tweenharddisciplines(HDs)softdisciplines(SDs)inresearcharticleabstractssettingpracticesfnovicewriterswhentheywriteanabstractappropriatetoaparticulardisciplinarycommunity.Basedontheselfestablishedcpusof40RAAs20RAAsdrawnfr

7、omEconomics(Ec)Engineering(En)respectivelyaprofoundcontrastiveanalysisoftheuseofengagementresourceshasbeenconductedbyexplinghowwritersofEcEnexploittheseresourcestoachievetheirsamecommunicativepurposeineachmoveofthisgenre

8、.StartingwiththegenreanalysisofabstractsinthiscpuswithapurposetorevealwhichrheticalstructuretheyfollowtheIMRDmodeltheCARSmodelitturnsoutthatthediscrepancyinuseofengagementresourcesareattributedtodisciplinaryvariationdiff

9、erentcommunicativepurposesthatwritersintendtoachieveineachmove.Themainfindingsofthepresentthesishaveboththeeticalpedagogicalimplications.TheeticallythecombinationoftwotheiesSwales’genreanalysisatmacrolevelMartin’sengagem